Friday, July 27, 2007

Racial Segregation: Sin in the Church, pt. 1

Sin in the church is nothing new. The Scripture is brutally honest in pointing out the shortcomings of the Old Testament saints and the New Testament church. Church history is full of failures, missteps, and grave errors committed by those who claimed to be Christian. To be sure, the church has made many positive contributions to the world (i.e., social justice, education, and healthcare), but even the church’s best efforts are tainted with sin. This is why Christians must rely daily on God’s grace and forgiveness (1 John 1:9).

It’s easy to own up to the sins of the past; it’s much harder to acknowledge and confess our current sins. This is why sin is so dangerous; it causes us to conceal, ignore, and make excuses when we clearly fall short of God’s standards. There’s always the temptation to be like the Pharisees by denying our sin and pretending to be perfect, but the Apostle John warns, “If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us” (1 John 1:8).

Today, there’s no better example of the church trying to conceal, ignore, and make excuses for its sin than in the area of race relations. The fact that Sunday morning is the most racially segregated hour in America is a huge blight on the American church and is extremely damaging to our witness to the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The Gospel (salvation by grace through faith in Christ) is for every nation, tribe and tongue (Rev. 5:9), and the goal of the Gospel is to make every race one in Christ (Eph. 2:14-18). The world hates, discriminates, and divides on race, social status, and any number of things, but God has clearly condemned this and calls Christians to unite under the Lordship of Christ. This is what Paul meant when he wrote, “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Gal. 3:28). Unfortunately, the American church has chosen to remain divided over race—and to us it is sin.

In his book, “The Bible and Race,” T. B. Maston writes, “If God is no respecter of persons, if he shows no partiality, our ultimate goal should be the elimination of all partiality, prejudices, and discrimination from our lives.” A few chapters later he writes, “If Christians do not attempt honestly to apply the Christian spirit and Christian principles to race relations, how can they expect others to respect their Christian claims or to hear and accept the message they proclaim? The race problem is, in a very real sense, ‘American Christianity’s test case.’” Maston wrote these words in the late 1950’s; sadly, the racial wall of segregation in the American church has not improved much since then. It is to our shame that secular culture has made greater strides in race relations and desegregation than the church.

Over the next few weeks we’ll take a closer look at the problem, build a scriptural framework for thinking about the issue, and then give some suggestions for a way forward.

a pdf version of this entry is available here

Labels:

Friday, July 20, 2007

The Offensive Nature of the Cross

Scott Guthrie, Minister of Music & Education at Trinity Church, is writing this week while Billy continues his doctoral work.

If it is difficult to accept that God became man, then His sacrificial death is even harder to believe. So it should come as no surprise when people are offended by the message of the cross. In fact, to the heart unmoved by God, the message of the crucified Christ can do nothing but offend.

First, the cross offends human decency. The cross was a vile instrument of death, cruel by anyone’s standards. The Jews viewed crucifixion as a curse from God (Deut. 21:23), reserved for blasphemers and idolaters. For Messiah to be identified with such sinners was detestable; for Him to be crucified like them was unthinkable. The Romans reserved crucifixion for notorious criminals, rebellious slaves, and those committing treason. Cicero, a Roman statesman, political theorist, and philosopher, wrote, “This very word ‘cross’ should be removed not only from the person of a Roman citizen but from his thoughts, his eyes, his ears.” Even basic human decency recoils at the shame and horror of the cross.

Next, the cross offends human wisdom, which marvels at new and complex ideas and develops philosophies to explain the world in which we live. It elevates the powerful, the intellectual, and the wealthy. Consequently, human wisdom thinks it intellectually irresponsible to believe such a foolish message as that of the cross. But in Isaiah 55:8 God declares, “My thoughts are not your thoughts, Nor are your ways My ways,” and Paul tells us in 1 Corinthians 1:27 that “God has chosen the foolish things of the world to shame the wise.” The message of the cross is, by God’s design and for His glory, contrary to everything glorified by human wisdom.

Finally, the cross offends human pride. The inclination of natural man (as opposed to the man led by the Spirit) is to deny his depravity and believe he is basically good. He admits his imperfection, but is convinced he can overcome his weaknesses through self-effort, looking to Jesus merely as an example to follow or a great moral teacher. But Jesus did not come to show man how to improve himself, for all have sinned (Rom. 3:23) and are powerless to escape the condemnation of the Law. Rather, Jesus came “to give His life a ransom for many” (Mt. 20:28), declaring, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me” (John 14:6). This means salvation lies totally outside man himself, in the person and work of Christ, and leaves no place for human pride.

As fallen human beings, the message of the cross offends us in every way. Nevertheless, it is at the heart of the gospel, “the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes” (Rom. 1:16), and no one is saved apart from it. But the offense continues unless God gives eyes to see and ears to hear. This is why Jesus told His disciples, “No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him” (John 6:44).

a pdf version of this entry is available here

Labels:

Friday, July 13, 2007

A Perspective on Worship Wars

Scott Guthrie, Minister of Music & Education at Trinity Church, is writing this week while Billy continues his doctoral work.

Without a doubt, music in corporate worship is one of the most controversial issues facing the American church. Disunity abounds in churches today, as those enamored with organ music and those defiantly chained to their guitar amps stand toe to toe, buckle to buckle, and, ironically, sing together, I Shall Not Be Moved. People will tolerate shoddy preaching, excuse inept handling of God’s Holy Word, and even permit false doctrine. But to parody Merle Haggard, “When you’re running down my music, man, you’re walking on the fightin’ side of me.” Suffice it to say that music is the highest passion for a great many people in today’s churches.

At this point, it is important to remember that the chief end of man is to glorify God and enjoy Him forever. Any positive thing we do that brings God glory can be identified as worship. One of the most fantastic ways we can worship God is to cause others to see Him for who He is and what He’s done and have them join us in glorifying Him; this multiplies His worshipers, and therefore His worship. Jesus Himself prayed that His followers would be unified so the world would know that God sent Him (John 17:21). Our unity testifies to Christ’s identity, His purpose, His love, and His greatness. God uses this testimony to create for Himself new worshipers, increasing His glory.

Today, music has become synonymous with worship, and a divisive battle rages over which ‘worship style’ most glorifies Him. Ironically, by attempting to ‘give God the greatest glory’ (which is really only a veiled attempt to see our own desires satisfied), we are denying God glory by our disunity. Even more ironic is that in our crusade to justify certain worship styles because of their appeal to the culture, we actually drive culture further from God through our division.

Still think music is the most important thing?

When passion for a musical style is greater than the desire to see God glorified, our worship has shifted objects; we actually begin to worship our worship. The issue of music ceases to be merely problematic and becomes idolatrous. To be sure, there are issues to be discussed regarding music in corporate worship, and differing opinions are sure to abound. But in every discussion, in every debate, the glory of God must be the one thing that will not, that cannot, be sacrificed. We must glorify Him in both our unity of spirit and our diversity of talents and gifts.

The ‘saving grace’ in all this mess is that God is jealous for His own glory and will not share it with anyone or anything. God is the only being in existence for whom the pursuit of His own glory is not a sin. He will be glorified; He will draw those to Him whom He has chosen. We may fail, but God never fails.

So let us not make much of music. Let us make much of God

a pdf version of this entry is available here

Labels: ,

Friday, July 06, 2007

The Protestant Work Ethic, pt. 4

The doctrine of vocation--the idea that we love and serve God and our neighbor through every aspect of our lives--is vital for understanding how we are to live faithfully as Christians. Properly understood and practiced, this doctrine rids us of the sacred/secular split that is so common in western Christianity. It also gives us a powerful ethic with which to judge our work and actions. In Martin Luther’s, “Small Catechism,” he gives advice on confessing one’s sins (notice how it centers on the idea of vocation): “Here reflect on your walk of life in light of the Ten Commandments: whether you are a father, mother, son, daughter, master, mistress, servant; whether you have been disobedient, unfaithful, lazy, whether you have harmed anyone by word or deed; whether you have stolen, neglected, wasted, or injured anything.” A powerful way to look at sin is to see it as a transgression against one’s vocation, which is ultimately a transgression against God.

We’ve discussed how the Protestant idea of vocation is far more than our jobs, but we can see how this ethic can be applied to our work. In order to love and serve both God and neighbor, a Christian doctor’s primary concern will not be money, but the health and life of the patient. A Christian lawyer will be concerned with truth and justice (remember those concepts?) rather than merely winning a case. A Christian police officer will work to protect the citizens, not intimidate or beat them. A Christian businessman will be more concerned with serving his customers and taking care of his employees than the bottom line. A Christian employee will not be lazy or careless, but diligent and hard working, even when the boss is not looking.

It’s also apparent that certain actions can be right or wrong depending on one’s vocation. It is illegal to cut someone with a knife, unless you’re a surgeon. A judge has the ability to sentence someone to death; a vigilante does not. It is wrong to kill one’s enemies unless you’re a soldier, and even then a soldier can only kill those his country is at war with, not his personal enemies.

The apostle Paul understood this concept well. In Romans 12:19 he writes, “Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, ‘Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.’” But how and when will God bring vengeance and wrath on evildoers? Paul is not just referring to a future day of judgment (it certainly must be included), but a few verses later (Romans 13:1-7) shows that God has appointed governments to carry out His wrath. Romans 13:4 says, “for he [the government] is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword [the power of life and death] in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer.” When we are wronged, we are not to avenge ourselves. We are to look to the government [army, police, courts, prisons], whose vocation is to punish evil.

If the Protestant idea of vocation is reclaimed and practiced, Christians will truly be salt and light (Matthew 5:13-16) in a decaying and dark world.

a pdf version of this entry is available here